This Friday, June 19, 2009, a meeting took place at our request to
City Hall, between 4 members of our association and wind Committee, chaired by the Mayor. To our question
as they worked out in a perspective of waste and energy consumption growth. In this scheme, sustainable development becomes an excuse to feel good, a selling point for manufacturers, an opportunity Economic developers
more industrialized.
Many fear for the value of their property without the arrival of the wind does not give them offset . We must not suspect them of selfishness. Selfishness would rather not take into account their concerns.
Quickly, the arguments have changed course: it would this time take the opportunity to commune the business tax provided by wind turbines
. Even if we sensed - for that is the main argument defended by so many elected officials involved in the projects of wind developers, and it is one we hear ourselves in the mouths of elected officials of our village and our ComCom - We're surprised.
Not this argument was clearly to the public, in public or openly to our association . In contrast, when we met the Mayor in the past, it assured us that
"business tax would not be as important as that for Bosc-le-Hard" and we could not quantify . Today is the clincher in a future Bosc-le-hard that we were portrayed on the verge of foundering and demographic associations. Blocking for municipal development? The indices of cavities that abound in the area. The issue deserves attention each, indeed.
To our question "Why talk about it only now and not have clearly presented your plans in this area?", The Mayor we were told repeatedly that she intended to do, but the bad Proceedings of the March 11 meeting (see our previous article "voiceless" ) had prevented! And since she no longer wants to write anything, fearing that his words are interpreted and distorted!
Here we are left speechless. If the municipality wanted to clearly communicate its arguments, it had the means to do ; evidence is a number of
collector
Bolhard'info that people will remember, in which, on 3 pages, the approach of our association has been blamed.
lot to say about the difficulty of accepting contradictory voices
e without some tempers by gestures or angry about, not having the habit of being contradicted. The debate is passionate, as we know, but we were coming on Friday to attack anyone. also regret to hear the echo of rumors and unwarranted accusations against our organization. We never claimed that malpractice had occurred around the project
E3, our writings on this blog, our leaflets, and presentation that we made on February 20 testify.
We never threatened anyone to sign our petition . Seriously, our two female representatives are not of the bouncers, nightclub, and have struggled to extract the 500 signatures collected to date! Consider, in the commission wind, such talk is not acceptable, we said. I
we have the satisfaction to bring this voice, which is the 500 Bolhardais
today. They are worried and must be heard. They are not reactionary, nor opposed any change, as it is too simple to believe. Like the members of our association, are not professional agitators. Asked to better use the energy we spend to oppose the wind project, we recall how forcefully many of us already are involved - or have invested in the past - in associations that drive our community. This criticism is unfair.
We give you
appointment Monday, June 22, 2009 at 20:15, mayor of Bosc-le-hard to give a few minutes before the meeting City Council, our petition - as authorized us to do the Mayor.
remains to know the decision of Council.
remember from that day the commitment was made to deny the proposed installation of wind turbines on our common if 400 signatures were collected . A challenge after our request for a local referendum was rejected for legal inconsistency. Today it would be all too late for it reappears ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment